Systematic Literature Review: Delone and Mclean Model using VOSViewer on Google Scholar Database Case Year 2010-2020
Abstract
This study aims to examine the development of the Delone and Mclean information system success model. This research was conducted to determine: (1) a map of the development of the number of publications on the Delone and Mclean model; (2) find out which scientific articles have the highest number of citations; (3) knowing the development map of scientific publications based on keywords. The data sources used in this study are scientific articles in the Google Scholar database with the keywords Delone and Mclean, with the categories article title, abstract, keywords in the 2016-2020 range. The search results show that there are 270 scientific articles that match the keywords based on the Harzing's Publish or Perish application. The results showed that the development of the Delone and Mclean model in 2010 - 2020 which was the highest in the Google Scholar database occurred in 2020 which reached 68 publications or 25%. Meanwhile, the publications that have the highest number of citations are Nils Urbach and Benjamin Müller (2016) which were quoted 379 times. The development map of scientific publications based on the keywords delone and mclean analyzed using the VOSViewer application shows that the development map of the delone and mclean model is divided into 4 clusters. The red cluster 1 consists of 14 items, the green cluster 2 consists of 11 items, the blue cluster 3 consists of 10 items, and the yellow cluster 4 consists of 6 items.
Downloads
References
[2] S. Hidayatullah, U. Khouroh, I. Windhyastiti, R. G. Patalo, and A. Waris, “Implementasi Model Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi DeLone And McLean Terhadap Sistem Pembelajaran Berbasis Aplikasi Zoom Di Saat Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2020, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v6i1.4165.
[3] D. Mardiana, G. Testiana, and M. Kadafi, “Penerapan Model Delone dan Mclean Pengukuran Kesuksesan Simak Online UIN Raden Fatah Palembang,” Penerapan Model Delone dan Mclean Pengukuran Kesuksesan Simak Online UIN Raden Fatah Palembang Dwi, vol. 3584, pp. 47–56, 2017.
[4] T. P. KPPRI, “Panduan Pembuatan Profil Google Scholar,” Universitas Indonesia, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://research.ui.ac.id/research/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Panduan-Membuat-Profil-Google-Scholar.pdf.
[5] A. M. Albantani, “Profil Google Scholar Dosen Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Berbasis Webometrics,” Perspekt. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 30, no. 1, p. 47, 2016, doi: 10.21009/pip.301.7.
[6] Tupan, R. N. Rahayu, R. Rachmawati, and E. S. R. Rahayu, “ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK PERKEMBANGAN PENELITIAN BIDANG ILMU INSTRUMENTASI,” BACA J. Dokumentasi dan Inf., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 135–149, 2018.
[7] F. Effendy, V. Gaffar, R. Hurriyati, and H. Hendrayati, “Penggunaan Pembayaran Seluler Dengan Vosviewer,” J. Interkom, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2021.
[8] P. Mongeon and A. Paul-Hus, “The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 213–228, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
[9] L. Hakim, “Analisis Bibliometrik penelitian inkubator bisnis pada publikasi ilmiah terindeks Scopus,” Procur. J. Ilm. Manaj., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 176–189, 2020.
[10] Tupan, “Pemetaan Bibliometrik dengan Vosviewer Terhadap Perkembangan Hasil Penelitian Bidang Pertanian Di Indonesia,” Visi Pustaka, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 217–230, 2016.
[11] B. M. Nils Urbach, “The Updated Delone And Mclean Model Of Information Systems Success,” Inf. Syst. Theory, vol. 28, no. May, p. 461, 2012, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2.
[12] M.-H. Hsu, C.-M. Chang, K.-K. Chu, and Y.-J. Lee, “Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS success model and trust,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 36, pp. 234–245 Contents, 2014.
[13] C. Tam and T. Oliveira, “Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 61, p. 233e244 Contents, 2016.
[14] C. Bossen, L. G. Jensen, and F. W. Udsen, “Evaluation of a comprehensive EHR based on the DeLone and McLean model for IS success: approach, results, and success factors,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 85, pp. 940–953, 2013.
[15] A. H. Aldholay, O. Isaac, Z. Abdullah, and T. Ramayah, “The role of transformational leadership as a mediating variable in DeLone and McLean information system success model: The context of online learning usage in Yemen,” Telemat. Informatics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1421–1437, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.012.
[16] C. Tam and T. Oliveira, “Understanding mobile banking individual performance: The DeLone & McLean model and the moderating effects of individual culture,” Internet Res., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 538–562, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IntR-05-2016-0117.
[17] A. Ojo, “Validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model,” Healthc. Inform. Res., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–66, 2017.
[18] A. I. Alzahrani, I. Mahmud, T. Ramayah, Osama Alfarraj, and N. Alalwan, “Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model,” J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., pp. 1–16, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0961000617726123.
[19] S. Mardiana, J. H. Tjakraatmadja, and A. Aprianingsih, “DeLone-Mclean information system success model revisited: The separation of intention to Use - Use and the integration of technology acceptance models,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, vol. 5, pp. 172–182, 2015.
[20] M. M. Al-Debei, D. Jalal, and E. Al-Lozi, Measuring web portals success: A respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model, vol. 14, no. 1. 2013.